data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5286/b52868c3c92607b554e1b7c94688d4586f8630ab" alt=""
One other thing about this article: Noonan points out that Grandmothers have a lot of wisdom, and they have the kind of discipline and sensibility to restrain from the things that "are not nice." Noonan writes, "Fifty years ago, no one speaking at a respected political gathering would say, would even think of saying that Adlai Stevenson is a faggot. Nor would Arthur Godfrey or Jack Paar have declared on their television shows that we'd be better off if Eisenhower died. Is our discourse deteriorating? Yes, it is." Although I agree with Noonan's sentiments, I do find it troubling that prior generations demonstrated such great restraint, yet were capable of such great oppression with reference to race relations. They wouldn't have called other candidates "faggots", but they wouldn't have had a problem calling a black candidate a "nigger." Just a thought.
I still get Noonan's point, and I think the article merits acclaim. Her basic points are true and much needed in today's political world.
1 comment:
Very good post. I think you are correct in your observations about what was restricted in the past. I am one of those who care but are completely frustrated at the left and right. I suppose a lot of my frustration comes from the religous right because they should know better.
Anyway, good post.
Post a Comment